Defined Contribution Plans
Benefits built through contributions to individual accounts, reflecting contributions, investment results, and fees. We look at who contributes, how it is allocated, and how it fits the wider retirement strategy.
Bridges and Associates works with clients on executive compensation and benefits, and on the retention and succession decisions tied to them.
We begin with what you want to accomplish, not with a product. We evaluate retirement and incentive plan structures against your objectives, your financial commitments, and your responsibilities to your executives. What comes out of that is a framework you can actually decide from.
Each structure answers a different design question. Which one fits depends on who participates, what you are trying to accomplish, the financial commitment, and the plan requirements that apply.
Benefits built through contributions to individual accounts, reflecting contributions, investment results, and fees. We look at who contributes, how it is allocated, and how it fits the wider retirement strategy.
Compensation paid in a future period, outside a qualified retirement plan, for selected executive, retention, or retirement objectives. Payment timing and tax rules need careful review.
A specified benefit, commonly set by a formula tied to compensation and service. We weigh the intended benefit against funding obligations, cost variability, and administration.
Compensation linked to share value or its growth under a defined formula, without granting actual shares. Valuation, vesting, payment events, and cash needs all have to be addressed.
These structures overlap. A deferred phantom stock arrangement may also fall under nonqualified deferred compensation rules. Legal, tax, actuarial, and accounting input is coordinated as the design requires.
A structured review connects your objectives with the relevant structures, their financial implications, and a defined next step. Scope and professional responsibilities are settled before any plan development begins.
Your leadership requirements, the outcome you want, the decision timeline, and the compensation and benefit arrangements already in place.
Participation, benefit design, vesting, payment timing, and how each structure relates to the retention or succession objective driving the review.
Projected costs, funding or payment obligations, administration, and what changes when the assumptions do, with the right professionals on the technical questions.
A comparison of the alternatives, the material assumptions, the open issues, and who is responsible for what.
You establish the need and the people it affects. We make sure the arrangement is clear about what it is for and what it commits you to.
Most of our experience is in financial services, and a bank carries a test other organizations do not: incentive compensation has to answer for risk, effective controls, and governance. We keep that in front of the board from the first conversation, and we frame every alternative so a committee can weigh its purpose, its financial implications, and its consistency with the bank's oversight practices.
Informed by the Federal Reserve's Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies.
Tommy BridgesPresident
Rick McCarterConsultant
More than 80 years of combined financial services experience, including work with banking executives and financial advisors. One of us has spent 40 years in this business.
We do not sell insurance or securities, and we are not attorneys, accountants, or actuaries. We work alongside the professionals who provide that advice, so what we recommend is never bent by a product we carry.
Fifteen to twenty minutes. We introduce the firm, learn your priorities, walk through the structures that apply, and set out what a review would involve. Nothing is put forward for approval.